<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: St. Saddam, Martyr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wigglebrick.com/st-saddam-martyr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wigglebrick.com/st-saddam-martyr/</link>
	<description>Top Secret. Confidential. Hush Hush.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:56:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Schmoediddle</title>
		<link>http://wigglebrick.com/st-saddam-martyr/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Schmoediddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 21:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wigglebrick.com/st-saddam-martyr/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>For those of you with patients dead-set against abortion, advocate capital punishment. If they are for one and against the other (doesn&#039;t matter which), you&#039;ve driven a wedge of contradiction into their overall stance on &quot;Life&quot; issues. In other words, you&#039;ve convinced them to be pro-life in some circumstances, but not others. 

This accomplishes two objectives. 1) Their positions are plainly inconsistent to their liberal or conservative opponents, so they instantly lose credibility. And 2) you&#039;re helping them wrap their minds around our brand of &lt;i&gt;functionalism&lt;/i&gt; where people have merit on what they do, not for simply being a person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you with patients dead-set against abortion, advocate capital punishment. If they are for one and against the other (doesn&#8217;t matter which), you&#8217;ve driven a wedge of contradiction into their overall stance on &#8220;Life&#8221; issues. In other words, you&#8217;ve convinced them to be pro-life in some circumstances, but not others. </p>
<p>This accomplishes two objectives. 1) Their positions are plainly inconsistent to their liberal or conservative opponents, so they instantly lose credibility. And 2) you&#8217;re helping them wrap their minds around our brand of <i>functionalism</i> where people have merit on what they do, not for simply being a person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
